Tuesday, August 26, 2008

William B.J. Lawson

I commented about Ron Paul and gave a very brief description of a few of the things he stands for, as well as explained what the Campaign for Liberty is. Today I bring up another politician that I have come to support. The funny thing is he is running for a House of Representatives seat in North Carolina. But what I find fascinating about him is that he is only 34 years old (Ron Paul is more than twice his age). He is challenging Congressman David Price who has held the office for all but two years since January 1987.

B.J. Lawson went through medical school but dropped out to launch a software company that allowed doctors to access employee records via their blackberry or other PDA. It grew to over 70 employees, and he later sold the company. I respect him for taking a big risk leaving a medical career that surely would have been quite lucrative (doctors generally make the big bucks after paying their dues, as i'm sure you are aware of). He has become a student of economics and the markets, as well as the constitution. He has very similar views to Ron Paul and has appeared at more than one Ron Paul speaking engagement and will be in the Twin Cities to emcee an event this Sunday night. What I am most excited about is the youthfulness that this brings to the Campaign for Liberty and conservatism, and I believe that while Ron Paul is the name and face of this movement, it surely will not last if the movement is based on one person and the success of that individual.

B.J. Lawson's website is http://www.lawsonforcongress.com/ check it out if you are interested.

Monday, August 25, 2008

Who is Ron Paul?

Who is Ron Paul? When I hear this question, I have trouble finding a place to begin. I did not know who he was 6 months ago, and until I went on Google and headed to his campaign site for this presidential campaign a number of months ago, I couldn’t have told you a thing about him. All I knew was that he was a republican running for the presidential nomination. More so now, I hear the question is, “So he’s out of the race, why are people still so interested in him?”

Well, let me give you a short recap about who he is, what he stands for, and why I will not vote for either Jon McCain or Barack Obama in the upcoming election but instead a third-party candidate. Ron Paul is a Congressman from Texas who stands for a limited government that abides strictly by the Constitution. He believes that the federal government has gone far from conducting duties as explained by the Constitution to a government that is becoming larger and that consistently makes laws and performs actions that are not specified in the Constitution. This has resulted in a huge national debt, the United States acting as a World Police with troops and military bases in over a hundred countries, unnecessary wars that were never approved by Congress, an erosion of personal liberties, and a government that is controlled by powerful special interests. Again, he believes in a limited government that acts in accordance to the Constitution. Just to be less general, a few specific things he believes in is bringing our troops home stationed across the world (we have a presence of 70,000 military personnel…in Germany alone), ending the War on Drugs, Free Trade, eliminating the Federal Reserve, eliminating the Income Tax, ending the War on Iraq, Second Amendment rights, and opposition to the Patriot Act. These are just a few of the positions that Ron Paul holds. If you haven’t guessed already, he is a libertarian-leaning Conservative. What I have found remarkable about all the political positions he holds is that there are very specific reasons in support of them, and so far almost every position has made sense to me.


So what is the big deal? Well, Ron Paul was the only Republican running for the nomination that was openly and strongly against the War on Iraq. His views oftentimes clash with the views of some of the current big-name Republicans (George Bush, Jon McCain, Rudolph Guliani, etc.). The people who have been caught up in the “Ron Paul Revolution” are those who are not satisfied with the direction the Republican Party has been going and Paul is someone who has stepped up and wants nothing more than to bring the party back to its Conservative roots.


The Campaign for Liberty, which officially launches September 2nd at the Target Center, is the new campaign to bring about the change that I just spoke of. It is a campaign to elect officials who vow to respect the Constitution, are proponents of limited government, and who want less government intrusion and more protection of liberties and privacy. They are a group of people who will not be ignored, and who will not vote for Jon McCain or other politicians who do not respect the Constitution and liberty. This campaign is not about Ron Paul, but is about long-term change.


So as you can see, as a member of the Campaign for Liberty, I simply cannot bring myself to vote for Barack Obama or Jon McCain in the upcoming Presidential election (nor Norm Coleman or Al Franken, but more on that later). I hope this post was helpful to anyone who does not know who Ron Paul is, or has heard of the Campaign for Liberty and was unsure of its purpose.

*picture used from http://www.clipartguide.com

Why I support ending the War on Drugs

As I become more and more educated about governmental policies, their intent, and their results, I have recently became aware of an issue that I have been very apathetic about in the past. This issue is the war on drugs.

I want to start with saying I have never and have no intention of ever smoking weed. Sad this should even make a difference, as that is not the issue at all.

Why was marijuana made illegal? Most people do not know this, but it was made illegal mainly due to racism in the United States. Due to immigration of Mexicans, Americans were exposed to marijuana (marijuana was popular among Mexicans at the time). A Texas Legislator’s famous quote, “All Mexicans are crazy, and this stuff [marijuana] is what makes them crazy." Marijuana was believed to make people insane and cause them to murder among other things. Dr. James C. Munch testified in court that marijuana had turned him into a bat when he tried it. He later became the US Official Expert on Marihuana.

When alcohol prohibition occurred, it is common knowledge that a black market formed that made some people very rich. This also caused a lot of violence to come about. (Hmm. Something being made illegal and therefore causing a huge black market and violence. Sounds like something going on today, doesn’t it?) Let’s look at marijuana versus tobacco. Tobacco is legal and can be bought at pretty much any gas station in the country. Tobacco kills about 390,000 people a year. Deaths related to alcohol are about 80,000. Marijuana kills zero.* It is not a lethal drug. I love this quote from the Schaffer Library of Drug Policy, “All illegal drugs combined kill about 4,500 people per year, or about one percent of the number killed by alcohol and tobacco. Tobacco kills more people each year than all of the people killed by all of the illegal drugs in the last century.”

*http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/LIBRARY/basicfax3.htm

What is the war on drugs costing us as a nation? Well, in direct cost of enforcing drug policy, I again want to use a quote from the Schaffer Library of Drug Policy:

“The cost to put a single drug dealer in jail is about $450,000, composed of the following:

The cost for arrest and conviction is about $150,000.

The cost for an additional prison bed is about $50,000 to $150,000, depending upon the jurisdiction.

It costs about $30,000 per year to house a prisoner. With an average sentence of 5 years, that adds up to another $150,000.

The same $450,000 can provide treatment or education for about 200 people. In addition, putting a person in prison produces about fifteen dollars in related welfare costs, for every dollar spent on incarceration. Every dollar spent on treatment and education saves about five dollars in related welfare costs.”

Why are we wasting so much money enforcing a policy that has failed to curb usage in all its years of law? The costs are astounding. As I am writing this, there has been over 29.5 BILLION tax dollars spent on the war on drugs this year alone. That is your money, taken by the government, to enforce a policy that simply does not make sense. To make the case that these drugs should be illegal for the ‘safety’ of our country, you would have to go no further than the quote about how many deaths have occurred due to tobacco and alcohol in the USA on a yearly basis. To see how much money has been spent so far this year on the War on Drugs, go to http://www.drugsense.org/wodclock.htm

I also want to direct you to a very disturbing page that shows those who died in SWAT Team raids. I actually heard about one in St. Paul just this morning. The swat team raided an apartment and a man fled to his room with his wife believing they were being robbed. He started shooting at them through his bedroom door, causing the swat team to shoot back. He had six children present who were all under 18. They shouted to their father and told him that they were police. Nobody was killed and it was the result of a wrong address. Many others are not as fortunate. Please take a look at this page: http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/stories/2003/08/17/drugWarVictims.html

How many must die for us to stop this embarrassing war? I have only looked into this issue for two, maybe three days yet I already have a barrage of information that makes any case to continue this war on drugs pathetic. The most enraging part of this whole issue is the issue of medical marijuana. Mccain, Romney, and Guiliani all say that there is no evidence that marijuana can be used as a medicine more effectively than other medicine and therefore are against legalization.

I’m sure they never saw the movie “In Pot We Trust” see: http://www.medicalcannabis.com/documentary.htm

I read a story a couple days ago about someone’s mother who had some nerve damage due to a surgery. It was constant, nonstop pain so much so that she could not take a regular shower because she would collapse due to the pain caused by the water contact with her skin. She tried all sorts of pain relievers, but none could suppress the pain. She finally tried marijuana, and it was like no other pain reliever she had tried. She could go to sleep at night pain free and could function on a day-to-day basis without having to endure a pain that brought her many times to the brink of suicide. The son of this woman is now a huge activist against the war on drugs.

Just think about this scenario: Our government, elected by us, finds people in extreme pain who grow small amounts of marijuana they use as medicine to relieve their pain. They go in, arrest that person and throw them in jail. What is wrong with this scenario?

This debate is not about the morality of using marijuana or other “illegal” drugs, it is about whether or not our government has a right to tell us if we can or cannot be involved in these activities. If anything, that $600 a second our government spends on the war of drugs should be poured into rehab programs and helping people cope with drug addictions and allow individuals who need marijuana for medicinal reasons have it. I would think most would find it a hard time expressing their reasons against legalizing medical marijuana to someone who has just told them the intense struggle that they have had with certain diseases.

It’s time for us to change these ridiculous prohibitions and stop being hypocrites who allow tobacco to kill well over a quarter million people a year yet arrest people who smoke a plant to relieve their pain.